methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Pretotyping with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Pretotyping
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Paper illustration of a Test Card with four fields for hypothesis, test, metric, and success threshold.
Product Discovery
Test Card
Paper illustration of a Learning Card with four fields for hypothesis, observation, insight, and action.
Product Discovery
Learning Card
Purposedifferent
Pretotyping clarifies whether a customer problem and solution idea create enough real demand. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence, and captures the result as a pretotyping sketch, test setup, and conversion data.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success.The Learning Card connects traceable test results to a reasoned next action while keeping the limits of the insight visible.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowLow
Timedifferent
Stunden bis wenige Tage2-6 h20-35 min25-40 min
Participantsdifferent
1-43-81-51-5
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Pretotyping sketch, Test setup, Conversion data, Go or no-go decisionCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention IdeasTest Card with a pre-set thresholdLearning Card with evidence and next action
Tagsno overlap
ValidationDemandMVP
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryLearning
Add more methods