View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Pre-Mortem |  Product Discovery Smoke Test |  Product Strategy ICE Scoring |  Growth A/B Testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures. | When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all. | When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 20–45 min | 1-5 Tage | 30-60 min | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | Small cross-functional group | Nutzertraffic | 2-8 | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Risk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption log | Interest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note | ICE Table, Top Idea List | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary |
Tagsno overlap | RiskDecisionFailurePlanning | ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth | PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation |