methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A hypothetical failure makes concrete risks, signals, and fitting mitigations visible.
Decision Making
Pre-Mortem
Paper illustration for Fault Tree Analysis.
Operations
Fault Tree Analysis
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration of Barrier Analysis with its method-specific working model.
Operations
Barrier Analysis
Purposedifferent
In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures.For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.For a risk that can only be managed through multiple layers of protection, the method examines the effectiveness of each barrier. It shows where safeguards are missing, too weak, or fail under real conditions.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowMedium
Timedifferent
20–45 min2-6 h10-20 min daily2-4 h
Participantsdifferent
Small cross-functional group3-812-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Risk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption logFault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control ActionsDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesBarrier Inventory, Failure Analysis per Barrier, Action Backlog
Tagsno overlap
RiskDecisionFailurePlanning
RiskRoot causeSafety
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Root causeSafetyIncident
Add more methods