View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Pre-Mortem |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Decision Making Assumption Surfacing |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 20–45 min | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | Small cross-functional group | 3-12 | 2-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Risk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption log | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder |
Tagsno overlap | RiskDecisionFailurePlanning | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning |