View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making Pre-Mortem | ![]() Product Discovery Concierge MVP | ![]() Decision Making Decision Tree | ![]() Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 20–45 min | 1-4 Wochen | 30-90 min | 45-75 min |
Participantsdifferent | Small cross-functional group | 3-10 Kunden | 1-6 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Risk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption log | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Decision Tree, Option Map, Assumption List | Test Matrix, Test Plan |
Tagsno overlap | RiskDecisionFailurePlanning | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | DecisionTreeOptions | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions |



