methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A hypothetical failure makes concrete risks, signals, and fitting mitigations visible.
Decision Making
Pre-Mortem
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration for Risk Storming.
Architecture
Risk Storming
Purposedifferent
In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowLow
Timedifferent
20–45 min1-4 Wochen1-2 Tage60-90 min
Participantsdifferent
Small cross-functional group1-61-44-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Risk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption logExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summaryArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewAnnotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog
Tagsno overlap
RiskDecisionFailurePlanning
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation
Add more methods