View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |  Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping |  Engineering Goal Question Metric |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 60–90 min | 90-180 min | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 2-8 | 3-6 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | GQM Table, Metric Profiles | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tags1 shared | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |