View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |  Agile Specification by Example |  Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping |  Agile Example Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 60-90 min pro Feature | 60–90 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-6 | 2-8 | 3-7 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement |