View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |  Product Discovery Riskiest Assumption Test |  Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. | When an idea hinges on one critical unknown, it prioritizes testing that exact piece of uncertainty first. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritized list of assumptions, a test plan, and a result report. | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 1-2 Wochen pro Iteration | 60–90 min | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 2-6 | 2-8 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder | Prioritized Assumption List, Test Plan, Results Report | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tagsno overlap | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryAssumptions | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |