View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |  Operations Gemba Walk |  Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping |  Operations A3 Problem Solving |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 30-120 min | 60–90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 2-6 | 2-8 | 2-5 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis |
Tagsno overlap | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning | LeanObservationProcessOperations | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations |