Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Selected:Power Interest Grid Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Stakeholder Mapping Stakeholder Salience Model

Criterion	Facilitation Power Interest Grid	Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis	Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping	Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model
Purposedifferent	When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy.	For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.	When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first.	When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy.
Complexitydifferent	Low	High	Low	Medium
Timedifferent	30-60 min	2-6 h	60–90 min	60-90 min
Participantsdifferent	2-8	3-10	2-8	3-6
Formatdifferent	Workshop	Workshop	Workshop + async	Workshop
Outputdifferent	Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder	FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions	Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes	Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class
Tagsno overlap	StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning	RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause	StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange	StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance

Add more methods