View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Power Interest Grid | ![]() Product Discovery Experiment Canvas | ![]() Facilitation Alignment Mapping | ![]() Product Discovery Test Card |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. | When experiments become unreadable after the fact, it arranges hypothesis, signal, and learning goal on a single canvas. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Completed Experiment Canvas and a Success Metric. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 30-60 min | 1-2 h | 20-35 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 1-5 | 4-12 | 1-5 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder | Completed Experiment Canvas, Success Metric | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Test Card with a pre-set threshold |
Tagsno overlap | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis |



