View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Power Interest Grid | ![]() Agile Affinity Estimation | ![]() Delivery RAID Log | ![]() Agile ROAM Board |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 30-90 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-12 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 3-15 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | RAID Log, Status Report Source | ROAM Board, Owner List |
Tagsno overlap | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment |



