methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a Polarity Map with two poles and four quadrants
Systems Thinking
Polarity Mapping
Iceberg Model method illustration showing its working structure
Systems Thinking
Iceberg Model
Paper illustration for Behavior Over Time Graph.
Systems Thinking
Behavior Over Time Graph
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Purposedifferent
Polarity Mapping makes tensions between two opposing poles tangible, such as standardization and adaptation or control and autonomy. The method guards against making apparent either-or decisions prematurely.The Iceberg Model separates visible events from patterns, structures, and mental models. This turns a single observation into a deeper understanding of why a problem keeps recurring.A Behavior Over Time Graph shows how a metric or observation develops over time. The method makes trends, breaks, and recurring patterns visible that get lost in snapshots.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowHigh
Timedifferent
1-2 h30-60 min20-45 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
3-122-101-103-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Polarity Map, Warning Signs, Balance ActionsIceberg Worksheet, Pattern Notes, Intervention IdeasBehavior Over Time Graph, Trend Hypotheses, Key EventsCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas
Tags1 shared
Systems thinkingTradeoffsLeadership
Systems thinkingRoot causePatterns
Systems thinkingPatternsDynamics
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
Add more methods