methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a Polarity Map with two poles and four quadrants
Systems Thinking
Polarity Mapping
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Paper illustration for Trade-off Analysis.
Decision Making
Trade-off Analysis
Paper illustration for Causal Factor Analysis.
Operations
Causal Factor Analysis
Purposedifferent
Polarity Mapping makes tensions between two opposing poles tangible, such as standardization and adaptation or control and autonomy. The method guards against making apparent either-or decisions prematurely.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.With limited resources, quality, speed, cost, and risk almost always compete with each other. Trade-off Analysis makes these tensions explicit and prevents decisions from producing hidden side effects.For an event with a complicated course, the method breaks down the contributing factors along the timeline. It shows how conditions, decisions, and reactions together produce a course of events.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighMediumHigh
Timedifferent
1-2 h2-6 h45-120 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
3-123-82-83-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Polarity Map, Warning Signs, Balance ActionsCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention IdeasTrade-off Matrix, Criteria List, Decision Rationale, Accepted DownsidesEvent Timeline, Causal Factor Chart, Cause List, Corrective Actions
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingTradeoffsLeadership
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
TradeoffsDecisionCriteriaOptions
CausalityIncidentRoot causeTimeline
Add more methods