methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a Polarity Map with two poles and four quadrants
Systems Thinking
Polarity Mapping
Paper illustration for CATWOE Analysis.
Systems Thinking
CATWOE Analysis
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Rich Picture workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Systems Thinking
Rich Picture
Purposedifferent
Polarity Mapping makes tensions between two opposing poles tangible, such as standardization and adaptation or control and autonomy. The method guards against making apparent either-or decisions prematurely.CATWOE structures a problem from six viewpoints and prevents too narrow a view of the situation. Different experiences of the system become comparably discussable this way.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.A Rich Picture brings an unclear situation onto a shared drawing. It captures actors, tensions, information flows, and blind spots before the team jumps to solutions too early.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
1-2 h45-90 min30 min Setup, dann laufend30-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-123-81-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone2-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Polarity Map, Warning Signs, Balance ActionsCATWOE Canvas, Root Definition, Stakeholder Perspectives, ConstraintsRAID Log, Status Report SourceRich Picture, Problem Framing Notes
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingTradeoffsLeadership
Systems thinkingFramingStakeholders
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
Systems thinkingSoft systemsFramingVisualization
Add more methods