View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Polarity Mapping |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Systems Thinking Future Reality Tree |  Agile Start Stop Continue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Polarity Mapping makes tensions between two opposing poles tangible, such as standardization and adaptation or control and autonomy. The method guards against making apparent either-or decisions prematurely. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 45–75 min | 2-4 h | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | Team members involved | 3-8 | 3-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Polarity Map, Warning Signs, Balance Actions | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | Systems thinkingTradeoffsLeadership | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection |