View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Planning Poker | ![]() Team Design Team API | ![]() Agile Affinity Estimation | ![]() Agile ROAM Board |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 2-5 min je Item | Half day initial, dann laufend | 30-90 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-9 | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 3-12 | 3-15 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates | Team API Document | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | ROAM Board, Owner List |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment |



