View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Planning Poker |  Agile ROAM Board |  Delivery RAID Log |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-5 min je Item | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-9 | 3-15 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates | ROAM Board, Owner List | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |