View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Business Strategy PESTLE Analysis | ![]() Facilitation Power Interest Grid | ![]() Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model | ![]() Business Strategy SWOT Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | PESTLE Analysis makes political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental influences visible. The environment of an initiative is thereby read systematically instead of through isolated trends. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | SWOT Analysis arranges strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats into a compact picture of the situation. It keeps internal capabilities and external influences separate before strategic options emerge from them. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 30-60 min | 60-90 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 2-8 | 3-6 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | PESTLE Map, External Risks, Strategic Questions | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | SWOT matrix, Strategic options, Action list |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyMarketAnalysis | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | StrategyAnalysisMarketPositioning |



