methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a six-field PESTLE grid
Business Strategy
PESTLE Analysis
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration of a SWOT matrix with four separated quadrants and marked strategic options.
Business Strategy
SWOT Analysis
Purposedifferent
PESTLE Analysis makes political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental influences visible. The environment of an initiative is thereby read systematically instead of through isolated trends.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.SWOT Analysis arranges strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats into a compact picture of the situation. It keeps internal capabilities and external influences separate before strategic options emerge from them.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h15-45 min1-2 h30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
2-101-34-123-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
PESTLE Map, External Risks, Strategic QuestionsADR File, Decision Log, RationaleAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsSWOT matrix, Strategic options, Action list
Tagsno overlap
StrategyMarketAnalysis
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
StrategyAnalysisMarketPositioning
Add more methods