View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making PERT Estimation |  Product Discovery Smoke Test |  Knowledge Modeling Knowledge Mapping |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | On complex initiatives, a plain average tends to understate just how uncertain the outcome really is. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a PERT Estimate, Expected Value, and Risk Notes. | When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all. | Knowledge Mapping makes knowledge, gaps, and transfer paths visible across a field. It fits when expertise should not just exist but also be findable and transferable. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 1-5 Tage | 1-3 h | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | Nutzertraffic | 3-12 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | PERT Estimate, Expected Value, Risk Notes | Interest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note | Knowledge Map, Critical Knowledge Areas, Transfer Plan | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationUncertaintyRisk | ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth | KnowledgeMappingRisk | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |