methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for PERT Estimation.
Decision Making
PERT Estimation
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Paper illustration of Spotify Model Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Spotify Model Mapping
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent
On complex initiatives, a plain average tends to understate just how uncertain the outcome really is. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a PERT Estimate, Expected Value, and Risk Notes.When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
15-45 min45-90 min90-180 min1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
1-83-125-154-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
PERT Estimate, Expected Value, Risk NotesExpectation Map, Alignment Notes, AgreementsSpotify Model Map, Action ListAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tagsno overlap
EstimationUncertaintyRisk
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Add more methods