View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making PERT Estimation |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |  Decision Making Three-Point Estimation |  Facilitation Decision Jam |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | On complex initiatives, a plain average tends to understate just how uncertain the outcome really is. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a PERT Estimate, Expected Value, and Risk Notes. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | A single estimate for effort, time, or risk often looks too smooth for the real uncertainty behind it. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Three-Point Estimate, Risk Range, and Assumption Notes. | When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 1-3 h | 10-30 min je Item | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 5-30 | 1-8 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | PERT Estimate, Expected Value, Risk Notes | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | Three-Point Estimate, Risk Range, Assumption Notes | Problem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, Experiment |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationUncertaintyRisk | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | EstimationUncertaintyForecasting | FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop |