View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research Personas | ![]() Team Design Team API | ![]() Team Design Spotify Model Mapping | ![]() Facilitation Team Charter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When target groups stay too vague and teams talk about the same people differently, personas create a shared, solid picture of usage. Condensed profiles make needs, contexts, and differences tangible enough for decisions. | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Tage | Half day initial, dann laufend | 90-180 min | 2-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | Internes Team | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 5-15 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Persona Profiles, Needs Summary, Scenario Notes | Team API Document | Spotify Model Map, Action List | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes |
Tagsno overlap | ResearchCustomerSynthesis | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis | TeamAlignmentCollaboration |



