methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two user profile cards with a goal, behavior evidence, and an open research question.
UX Research
Personas
Paper illustration of Opportunity Scoring with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Opportunity Scoring
Paper illustration of a Test Card with four fields for hypothesis, test, metric, and success threshold.
Product Discovery
Test Card
Paper illustration of a JTBD interview notebook with a decision timeline, forces of change and a concise job hypothesis.
Product Discovery
Jobs to Be Done
Purposedifferent
When target groups stay too vague and teams talk about the same people differently, personas create a shared, solid picture of usage. Condensed profiles make needs, contexts, and differences tangible enough for decisions.When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes.The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success.When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 Tage60-120 min20-35 min1-3 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
Internes Team3-61-55-12 Interviews
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Persona Profiles, Needs Summary, Scenario NotesOpportunity Score Table, Top OutcomesTest Card with a pre-set thresholdJob Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity List
Tagsno overlap
ResearchCustomerSynthesis
PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis
CustomerOutcomesNeeds
Add more methods