View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Personas |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Facilitation 1-2-4-All |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When target groups stay too vague and teams talk about the same people differently, personas create a shared, solid picture of usage. Condensed profiles make needs, contexts, and differences tangible enough for decisions. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Tage | 5-15 min | 1-2 Tage | 10-20 min |
Participantsdifferent | Internes Team | 3-20 | 10-50 | 4-100+ |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Persona Profiles, Needs Summary, Scenario Notes | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes |
Tagsno overlap | ResearchCustomerSynthesis | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | FacilitationInclusionIdeation |