View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |  Facilitation World Café |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. | When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 10-20 min je Frage | 60-180 min | 45-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 6-50 | 12-100+ | 3-10 | 8-80 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes | Table Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared Questions | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions |
Tags1 shared | LearningDialogueFacilitation | FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | FacilitationDialogueLarge group |