methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Peer Instruction.
Knowledge Modeling
Peer Instruction
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper session grid with two time blocks, three rooms, colored session cards and an open topic pool.
Facilitation
Barcamp
Purposedifferent
Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision.When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
10-20 min je Frage45-90 min45–75 minHalber Tag bis 2 Tage
Participantsdifferent
6-503-10Team members involved15-200
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning NotesResponsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsSession Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings
Tagsno overlap
LearningDialogueFacilitation
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
FacilitationLarge groupLearning
Add more methods