methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Peer Instruction.
Knowledge Modeling
Peer Instruction
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent
Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
10-20 min je Frage1-3 h5-15 min1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
6-505-303-204-12
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning NotesConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority AreasRanked list, Consensus signal, ShortlistAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tags1 shared
LearningDialogueFacilitation
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Add more methods