methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Peer Instruction.
Knowledge Modeling
Peer Instruction
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper session grid with two time blocks, three rooms, colored session cards and an open topic pool.
Facilitation
Barcamp
Paper illustration for Fishbowl Discussion.
Facilitation
Fishbowl Discussion
Purposedifferent
Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance.When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
10-20 min je Frage1-2 hHalber Tag bis 2 Tage45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
6-504-1215-2008-80
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning NotesAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsSession Board, Session Notes, Community LearningsDiscussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions
Tags1 shared
LearningDialogueFacilitation
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
FacilitationLarge groupLearning
FacilitationDialogueLarge group
Add more methods