View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations PDCA Cycle |  Agile Specification by Example |  Operations Gemba Walk |  Agile Example Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For an improvement that still has to prove itself in everyday work, the method runs it through small learning loops. It connects planning, checking, and standardization into a repeatable learning mode. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1 h bis mehrere Wochen | 60-90 min pro Feature | 30-120 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 3-6 | 2-6 | 3-7 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | PDCA Log, Experiment Plan, Learning Outcome, Standard Change | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | Continuous improvementLeanExperiments | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | LeanObservationProcessOperations | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement |