methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for PDCA Cycle.
Operations
PDCA Cycle
Paper illustration of Riskiest Assumption Test with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
Riskiest Assumption Test
Paper illustration of MVP Test Matrix with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
MVP Test Matrix
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
For an improvement that still has to prove itself in everyday work, the method runs it through small learning loops. It connects planning, checking, and standardization into a repeatable learning mode.When an idea hinges on one critical unknown, it prioritizes testing that exact piece of uncertainty first. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritized list of assumptions, a test plan, and a result report.When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1 h bis mehrere Wochen1-2 Wochen pro Iteration45-75 min1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-82-62-8Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
PDCA Log, Experiment Plan, Learning Outcome, Standard ChangePrioritized Assumption List, Test Plan, Results ReportTest Matrix, Test PlanClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tags1 shared
Continuous improvementLeanExperiments
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryAssumptions
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods