methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for PDCA Cycle.
Operations
PDCA Cycle
Paper illustration for Risk Storming.
Architecture
Risk Storming
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
For an improvement that still has to prove itself in everyday work, the method runs it through small learning loops. It connects planning, checking, and standardization into a repeatable learning mode.Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
1 h bis mehrere Wochen60-90 min1-5 Tage1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-84-12NutzertrafficNutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
PDCA Log, Experiment Plan, Learning Outcome, Standard ChangeAnnotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action BacklogInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tagsno overlap
Continuous improvementLeanExperiments
RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods