methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for PDCA Cycle.
Operations
PDCA Cycle
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Paper illustration for Kaizen Event.
Operations
Kaizen Event
Purposedifferent
For an improvement that still has to prove itself in everyday work, the method runs it through small learning loops. It connects planning, checking, and standardization into a repeatable learning mode.When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.For a tightly scoped process segment with noticeable waste, the method bundles shared energy for change. It suits situations that call for fast learning loops and visible adjustments.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1 h bis mehrere Wochen5-15 min60-120 min0.5-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-83-205-124-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
PDCA Log, Experiment Plan, Learning Outcome, Standard ChangeRanked list, Consensus signal, ShortlistRanked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group PriorityKaizen Charter, Waste List, Improvement Experiments, Standard Work Update
Tagsno overlap
Continuous improvementLeanExperiments
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
LeanContinuous improvementOperations
Add more methods