View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations PDCA Cycle |  Agile Affinity Estimation |  Operations Gemba Walk |  Agile Planning Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For an improvement that still has to prove itself in everyday work, the method runs it through small learning loops. It connects planning, checking, and standardization into a repeatable learning mode. | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1 h bis mehrere Wochen | 30-90 min | 30-120 min | 2-5 min je Item |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 3-12 | 2-6 | 3-9 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | PDCA Log, Experiment Plan, Learning Outcome, Standard Change | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates |
Tagsno overlap | Continuous improvementLeanExperiments | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | LeanObservationProcessOperations | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam |