View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling PARA Method |  Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |  Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |  Product Discovery Opportunity Solution Tree |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The PARA Method organizes knowledge into Projects, Areas, Resources, and Archives. It creates order when digital notes, files, and tasks no longer cleanly fit current work. | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. | When discovery keeps swinging between goals, ideas, and learning loops, it creates clear steering logic. It connects the desired outcome, opportunities, and experiments into a legible structure. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h Setup, laufend | 30-60 min je Interview | 45-75 min | 1-2 h Setup, laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 1 | 5-12 Interviews | 2-8 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | PARA Structure, Project Notes, Knowledge Archive | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Test Matrix, Test Plan | Opportunity Solution Tree, Experiment Backlog, Learning Log |
Tagsno overlap | KnowledgeProductivityOrganization | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions | DiscoveryOutcomesExperimentsOpportunity |