View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making Option Framing | ![]() Product Discovery Problem Interview | ![]() Decision Making Decision Framing Workshop | ![]() Product Discovery Concierge MVP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In early decisions, alternatives are often still vague, incomplete, or blended together. Option Framing brings every possibility into a comparable form and makes visible which variant actually fits the question. | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. | When a decision is poorly framed, even good answers deliver little value. A Decision Framing Workshop sharpens the problem, goal, and boundaries before the actual weighing begins. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-120 min | 30-60 min je Interview | 60-120 min | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 5-12 Interviews | 4-10 | 3-10 Kunden |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Option Frames, Assumption Notes, Comparable Shortlist, Decision Inputs | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments | Decision Frame, Decision Question, Criteria List, Evidence Plan | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks |
Tagsno overlap | OptionsDecision framingStrategyComparison | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation | Decision framingAlignmentCriteriaOptions | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery |



