methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching tree with an outcome at its root, customer opportunities, solution options and small experiment cards.
Product Discovery
Opportunity Solution Tree
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Paper illustration of a Learning Card with four fields for hypothesis, observation, insight, and action.
Product Discovery
Learning Card
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
When discovery keeps swinging between goals, ideas, and learning loops, it creates clear steering logic. It connects the desired outcome, opportunities, and experiments into a legible structure.When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.The Learning Card connects traceable test results to a reasoned next action while keeping the limits of the insight visible.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 h Setup, laufend60-120 min25-40 min1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
2-65-121-5Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Opportunity Solution Tree, Experiment Backlog, Learning LogRanked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group PriorityLearning Card with evidence and next actionClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tagsno overlap
DiscoveryOutcomesExperimentsOpportunity
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryLearning
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods