methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching tree with an outcome at its root, customer opportunities, solution options and small experiment cards.
Product Discovery
Opportunity Solution Tree
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Paper illustration of MVP Test Matrix with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
MVP Test Matrix
Purposedifferent
When discovery keeps swinging between goals, ideas, and learning loops, it creates clear steering logic. It connects the desired outcome, opportunities, and experiments into a legible structure.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 h Setup, laufend120 min initial, dann laufend1-5 Tage45-75 min
Participantsdifferent
2-63-6Nutzertraffic2-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Opportunity Solution Tree, Experiment Backlog, Learning LogHEART-GSM Table, DashboardClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning DecisionTest Matrix, Test Plan
Tagsno overlap
DiscoveryOutcomesExperimentsOpportunity
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions
Add more methods