methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching tree with an outcome at its root, customer opportunities, solution options and small experiment cards.
Product Discovery
Opportunity Solution Tree
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
Paper illustration of a Learning Card with four fields for hypothesis, observation, insight, and action.
Product Discovery
Learning Card
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
Purposedifferent
When discovery keeps swinging between goals, ideas, and learning loops, it creates clear steering logic. It connects the desired outcome, opportunities, and experiments into a legible structure.GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.The Learning Card connects traceable test results to a reasoned next action while keeping the limits of the insight visible.When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 h Setup, laufend1-3 h25-40 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
2-62-81-53-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Opportunity Solution Tree, Experiment Backlog, Learning LogGap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk NotesLearning Card with evidence and next actionImpact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options
Tagsno overlap
DiscoveryOutcomesExperimentsOpportunity
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryLearning
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
Add more methods