View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |  Decision Making Force Field Analysis |  Product Strategy DIBB |  UX Design Lean UX Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | The Lean UX Canvas helps clarify user behavior, touchpoints, and concept decisions. It makes assumptions and desired outcomes visible and captures the result as a completed canvas, hypothesis list, and first experiment. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 45-90 min | 1-2 h | 2-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 3-12 | 2-8 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | Force Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Completed Lean UX Canvas, Hypothesis list, First experiment |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | ChangeDecisionStrategy | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | CanvasHypothesisOutcomesDiscovery |