methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Opportunity Scoring with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Opportunity Scoring
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration of a Test Card with four fields for hypothesis, test, metric, and success threshold.
Product Discovery
Test Card
Paper illustration of Lean UX Canvas with its method-specific working model.
UX Design
Lean UX Canvas
Purposedifferent
When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes.When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success.The Lean UX Canvas helps clarify user behavior, touchpoints, and concept decisions. It makes assumptions and desired outcomes visible and captures the result as a completed canvas, hypothesis list, and first experiment.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
60-120 min5-15 min20-35 min2-3 h
Participantsdifferent
3-63-201-53-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Opportunity Score Table, Top OutcomesRanked list, Consensus signal, ShortlistTest Card with a pre-set thresholdCompleted Lean UX Canvas, Hypothesis list, First experiment
Tagsno overlap
PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis
CanvasHypothesisOutcomesDiscovery
Add more methods