View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Product Discovery Test Card |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 5-15 min | 20-35 min | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 3-20 | 1-5 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Test Card with a pre-set threshold | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |