View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Facilitation Mind Mapping |  Product Discovery Hypothesis Prioritization Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. | When many hypotheses compete for attention, it brings order to their learning sequence and importance. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritization canvas and a hypothesis backlog. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 5-15 min | 15-45 min | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 3-20 | 1-10 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions | Prioritization Canvas, Hypothesis Backlog |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation | ExperimentsPrioritizationDiscoveryHypothesis |