View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring | ![]() Product Strategy DIBB | ![]() Decision Making Delphi Method | ![]() UX Design Lean UX Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. | The Lean UX Canvas helps clarify user behavior, touchpoints, and concept decisions. It makes assumptions and desired outcomes visible and captures the result as a completed canvas, hypothesis list, and first experiment. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 1-2 h | 1-4 Wochen | 2-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 2-8 | 6-30 Experten | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes | Completed Lean UX Canvas, Hypothesis list, First experiment |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy | CanvasHypothesisOutcomesDiscovery |



