View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |  Architecture Views and Beyond |  Product Discovery Opportunity Solution Tree |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | Views and Beyond organizes architecture into several views so no single diagram has to do everything at once. This makes it possible to choose the representation that fits the stakeholder's question. | When discovery keeps swinging between goals, ideas, and learning loops, it creates clear steering logic. It connects the desired outcome, opportunities, and experiments into a legible structure. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 1-3 Tage | 1-2 h Setup, laufend | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 1-4 | 2-6 | 1-3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Architecture Views, Cross-view Notes, Rationale | Opportunity Solution Tree, Experiment Backlog, Learning Log | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | DocumentationStakeholdersArchitecture | DiscoveryOutcomesExperimentsOpportunity | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance |