Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Selected:Opportunity Interview Opportunity Solution Tree User Interviews Hypothesis Prioritization Canvas

Criterion	Product Discovery Opportunity Interview	Product Discovery Opportunity Solution Tree	UX Research User Interviews	Product Discovery Hypothesis Prioritization Canvas
Purposedifferent	When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities.	When discovery keeps swinging between goals, ideas, and learning loops, it creates clear steering logic. It connects the desired outcome, opportunities, and experiments into a legible structure.	When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible.	When many hypotheses compete for attention, it brings order to their learning sequence and importance. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritization canvas and a hypothesis backlog.
Complexitydifferent	Medium	Medium	Low	Medium
Timedifferent	30-60 min je Interview	1-2 h Setup, laufend	30–60 min per interview	60-90 min
Participantsdifferent	5-12 Interviews	2-6	1 participant per interview	3-8
Formatdifferent	Workshop + async	Workshop + async	Workshop + async	Workshop
Outputdifferent	Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes	Opportunity Solution Tree, Experiment Backlog, Learning Log	Interview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary	Prioritization Canvas, Hypothesis Backlog
Tags1 shared	DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer	DiscoveryOutcomesExperimentsOpportunity	QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery	ExperimentsPrioritizationDiscoveryHypothesis

Add more methods