Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Selected:Opportunity Interview Opportunity Solution Tree Stakeholder Salience Model Power Interest Grid

Criterion	Product Discovery Opportunity Interview	Product Discovery Opportunity Solution Tree	Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model	Facilitation Power Interest Grid
Purposedifferent	When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities.	When discovery keeps swinging between goals, ideas, and learning loops, it creates clear steering logic. It connects the desired outcome, opportunities, and experiments into a legible structure.	When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy.	When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy.
Complexitydifferent	Medium	Medium	Medium	Low
Timedifferent	30-60 min je Interview	1-2 h Setup, laufend	60-90 min	30-60 min
Participantsdifferent	5-12 Interviews	2-6	3-6	2-8
Formatdifferent	Workshop + async	Workshop + async	Workshop	Workshop
Outputdifferent	Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes	Opportunity Solution Tree, Experiment Backlog, Learning Log	Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class	Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder
Tagsno overlap	DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer	DiscoveryOutcomesExperimentsOpportunity	StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance	StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning

Add more methods