View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 60-120 min | 1-2 Tage | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 5-12 | 10-50 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes |
Tagsno overlap | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds |